Sunday, October 29, 2006

In Case You Were Wondering Why Your Taxes are so Rediculously High

Well, it's the end of a busy time for Jane and I. We just completed our first grant proposals! Very exciting! A grant, proposal, incidentally, is when we ask the taxpayer (i.e. you) to give us hundreds of thousands of dollars (in my case more than half a million) for our research. I can't promise that it'll be worth it, but I know that we can't do our work without it - and this is how much it costs. Why? Because the companies that supply researchers know that they are the only ones to offer their kind of specialist equipment, and so they can charge pretty much whatever they want. And they do. A good example is the main piece of equipment in my laboratory, which is a mass spectrometer. The specific instrument I 'applied' for is a Micromass LCT, which is an entry level machine. In fact, it's probably the cheapest on the market. And the cost for this 3' x 3' x 3' box? $350,000 - the same as a reasonably sized house. But sometimes a scientist can cheat the system. This occurs when the instrument we need happens to be something that industry uses. Industry, you see, doesn't typically have access to government cash and the prices charged to them by suppliers reflects that. This is the situation for another instrument in my lab, called a VersaLaser, which is basically a laser printer on steroids. This baby doesn't just burn toner, it can cut into plastics, wood and etch metal and glass. The price for this cool piece of equipment? A pretty reasonable $15,000.
Jane's application process is relatively simple (well, it's alot of paperwork and, to be honest, nothing is actually simple in the funding game) - she is applying to NSERC for a 'Discovery Grant' which is to support her staffing and operations costs. Most of this will be to pay for grad student and post-doc 'trainees'. The bulk of her equipment costs will come out of her 'startup' grant which is provided to her by the university. As for me, I've got to buy lots of expensive equipment. Really big stuff you get from a 'Canadian Foundation for Innovation' (CFI) grant, which is bit of a funny thing because they only give you 40% of the money. Another 40% comes from a matching provincial grant (called the premier's research award or somesuch) and the 20% has to come from somewhere else, usually a vendor 'discount'. I say 'discount' (in quotes) because what this means is that the vendor overcharges by ~20% and then discounts it. The rest of my equipment (a lot of little stuff, <7000$) gets worked into a Discovery Grant application.
In any case, we've sent our grant applications out (through the York Office of Research, the proposals have to be read over and signed by the dean and the department head). Fingers crossed. And now you know (one of the many reasons) why your taxes are so high...

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i) I thought it was because of the healthcare costs of people who followed your buffet advice.

ii) Wow. I'm amazed that Waters/Micromass was able to squeeze the LCT into a 2-dimensional box! Amazing!

iii) Don't buy anything until we get a free meal out of it!

5:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, and

iv) "ridiculous" :)

6:01 AM  
Blogger Shawn Penson said...

That is expensive, it's on the order of out high resolution x-ray diffractometer, much bigger than the 3x3 box you use. Our crystal growth chamber is on the order of 1/2 million dollars. When I think about it though as our lab studiees materials used in industry to create LED's and other electronics, most of what we have is standard industry equipment "Modified". I guess that means 1/2 million is cheep.

8:30 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I guess you could say that theoretical research is much more cost efficient... all I need is a cool powerful computer (hopefully a cluster) which is much cheaper! Plus, I can run my "experiments" (computer simulations) while I sleep!

11:37 AM  
Blogger Derek said...

Yes, McGuillicuddy, I know that the organization for which you are now a wage slave makes some nice mass spectrometers. However, you are way behind Micromass in the laboratory 'footprint' department. Yes, the new LCT premier is so thin that it does not occupy three dimensional space. Leaving more room for test tubes, flasks and cramming my foot up your ass.

P.S. I will do everything in my power to ensure that we are treated to a fine lunch (preferably buffet) before I go buy my machine from someone else :-)

11:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've been supporting you both (through my taxes) for years. I don't mind at all -- I think it's worth it.

1:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You've been wasting (as have I) Canadian taxpayers' money for years. Why start caring now?

2:31 PM  
Blogger BR said...

I hope you were at least able to throw in a couple trips to the West Coast into your research plans.

2:43 PM  
Blogger Derek said...

To BR,

Hah! I hadn't thought of that, but there is a very good NMR group at UBC with whom I could very well end up collaborating... Not so much at UVic. Any NMR at Malaspina?

4:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

derek's counter
Counter
eXTReMe Tracker